Sunday 18 March 2012

Explicit Teaching - How to/Why not


The teacher in this clip (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h4q-bok644&feature=player_embedded#!) uses many good techniques, she returns to what she has already said, paraphrasing herself, to make sure all the students hear, and understand what she has spoken about. She let’s the students read along with her when she reads, so they can learn both visually, and aurally. She also uses feeling words rather than exact words, so saying that she ‘feels’ a word should included, rather than the fact is definitely should. This shows the students that there is no right or wrong way to summarise, because with summarising, as with many things in English, it’s not always the case of having all the answers.

She gets the students to talk with their learning partners, I would prefer, this early on in the lesson, for the students to be engaged in a whole group discussion. Although, whole group discussions obviously work better with older students, and this is a younger class.

, the teacher’s idea to let students have self study time, where she is able to help, and give feedback, is an interesting and, I think, great idea. The fact that she also tells students what is expected of them by the end of the lesson, is also interesting and useful. This lesson isn’t very interactive though, and you can see from the student’s faces that they are bored by the lesson. Whilst she requires student interaction, in is minimal and uniform. The students repeat what they’ve been told and students are not individualised or asked to be creative in anyway. On a blooms scale, this lesson only catches on to the lower bars. Not teaching anything higher than applying. Where as the first lesson makes students analyse the text, and evaluate the words they’ve chosen.

No comments:

Post a Comment